باریده، ر.، فرج نیا، ا. و حسن پور، ر. 1403. ارزیابی دقت دادههای بارش مجموعه دادههای ERA5-Land و CHIRPS. پنجمین همایش ملی مدیریت آب در مزرعه (آبیاری هوشمند). موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، کرج.
حیدری، س.، کریمی، م. و بیرانوند، ا. 1403. ارزیابی عملکرد داده های بازتحلیل ERA5 در تخمین بارش ایران، پژوهشهای دانش زمین. 15(2): 1-24. doi: 10.48308/esrj.2024.104225
رضیئی, ط. و ستوده، ف. 1396. بررسی دقت مرکز اروپایی پیشبینیهای میان مدت جوی (ECMWF) در پیش بینی بارش مناطق گوناگون اقلیمی ایران. فیزیک زمین و فضا. 43(1): 133-147. doi: 10.22059/jesphys.2017.57958
عزیزی، ج.، رسول زاده، ع.، رحمتی، ا.، شایقی، ا. و باختر، آ. 1399. ارزیابی عملکرد دادههای بازتحلیل شده Era-5 در تخمین بارش روزانه و ماهانه در استان اردبیل. تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران. 51 (11): 2937- 2951. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2020.302176.668600
غلامی، س.، فرج زاده، م. و قویدل رحیمی، ی. ۱۴۰۲. بررسی تطبیقی عملکرد پایگاههای داده CHIRPS و ERA5-Land در آشکارسازی خشکسالیهای ایران. جغرافیای طبیعی. 61: 1-22. doi: 20.1001.1.20085656.1402.16.61.1
Alexandridis, V., Stefanidis, S. and Dafis, S. 2023. Evaluation of ERA5 and ERA5-Land Reanalysis Precipitation Data with Rain Gauge Observations in Greece. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 26 : 104.
Asuero, A.G., Sayago, A. and González, A.G. 2006. The correlation coefficient: An overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 36: 41–59.
Deng, X., Nie, S., Deng, W. and Cao, W. 2018. Statistical evaluation of the performance of gridded monthly precipitation products from reanalysis data, satellite estimates, and merged analyses over China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 132, 621–637.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J. and Thépaut, J.N. 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 146: 1999–2049
Huang, X., Luo, G., Chen, C., Peng, J., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., Yao, B., Ma, Z. and Xi, X. 2021. How precipitation and grazing influence the ecological functions of drought-prone grasslands on the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains, China? Journal of Arid Land. 13: 88–97.
Izadi, N., Karakani, E.G., Saadatabadi, A.R., Shamsipour, A., Fattahi, E. and Habibi, M. 2021. Evaluation of ERA5 precipitation accuracy based on various time scales over Iran during 2000–2018. Water. 13(18): 2538. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ w1318 2538
Jiao, D., Xu, N., Yang, F. and Xu, K. 2021. Evaluation of spatial-temporal variation performance of ERA5 precipitation data in China. Scientific Reports. 11: 17956.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97432-y
Kokkalis, P., Al Jassar, H.K., Al Sarraf, H., Nair, R. and Al Hendi, H. 2024. Evaluation of ERA5 and NCEP reanalysis climate models for precipitation and soil moisture over a semi-arid area in Kuwait. Climate Dynamics. 62: 4893–4904.
Lavers, D.A., Simmons, A., Vamborg, F. and Rodwell, M.J. 2022. An evaluation of ERA5 precipitation for climate monitoring. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 148(748): 3124–3137.
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4351
Meng, X., Guo, J., and Han, Y. 2018. Preliminarily assessment of ERA5 reanalysis data. Journal of Marine Meteorology. 38(1): 91–99.
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., and Hersbach, H. 2021. ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth System Science Data. 13: 4349–4383.
Sharifi, E., Steinacker, R. and Saghafian, B. (2016). Assessment of GPM-IMERG and Other Precipitation Products against Gauge Data under Different Topographic and Climatic Conditions in Iran: Preliminary Results. Remote Sensing. 8(2): 135.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020135
Sheffield, J., Wood, E.F., Pan, M., Beck, H., Coccia, G., Serrat-Capdevila, A. and Verbist, K. 2018. Satellite remote sensing for water resources management: Potential for supporting sustainable development in data-poor regions. Water Resources Research. 54: 9724–9758.
Tang, G., Clark, M.P., Papalexiou, S.M., Ma, Z. and Hong, Y. 2020. Have satellite precipitation products improved over last two decades? A comprehensive comparison of GPM IMERG with nine satellite and reanalysis datasetsRemote Sensing of Environment. 240: 111697.
Tapiador, F.J., Turk, F.J., Petersen, W., Hou, A.Y., García-Ortega, E., Machado, L.A., Angelis, C.F., Salio, P., Kidd, C., Huffman, G.J. 2012. Global precipitation measurement: Methods, datasets and applications. Atmospheric Research. 104: 70–97.
Taylor, K.E. 2001. Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 106(D7): 7183–7192. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1029/ 2000J D9007 19
Xie, W., Yi, S., Leng, C., Xia, D., Li, M., Zhong, Z. and Ye, J. 2022. The evaluation of IMERG and ERA5-Land daily precipitation over China with considering the influence of gauge data bias. Scientific Reports. 12: 8085.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12307-0
Yang, M., Liu, G., Chen, T., Chen, Y. and Xia, C. 2020. Evaluation of GPM IMERG precipitation products with the point rain gauge records over Sichuan, China. Atmospheric Research. 246: 105101.
Zambrano, F., Wardlow, B., Tadesse, T., Lillo-Saavedra, M. and Lagos, O. 2017. Evaluating satellite-derived long-term historical precipitation datasets for drought monitoring in Chile. Atmospheric Research. 186: 26-42.