Effect of different intervals of tape drip irrigation on wheat yield and water use efficiency

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 daneshjo

2 GORGAN

3 Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Water and Soil Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

Abstract

Irrigation is known as one of the most important factors in the production of grains in dry climate. The present irrigation method used for wheat and alfalfa production is mainly surface irrigation (Basin, Border, and furrow) and this method consumes more water and has less water efficiency than innovative irrigation methods. Using pressurized irrigation systems can both save water and increase water use efficiency. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using strip drip irrigation in winter wheat. In order to determine the most suitable distance between irrigation tapes and find out the effect of Alternate Partial Root Drying (APRD) on water use efficiency, yield and components of wheat yield , a factorial experiment with 6 treatments and three replications was conducted in Pelband plain-Khorasan Razavi province- in 2016-2017. Then, water consumed, yield and its component yield were compared in traditional flooding method - conventional flooding. The treatments applied in this research consisted of drip-tape irrigation with distance of 50 cm (I1) and 60 cm (I2) and 70 cm (I3) and three intermittent drip-tape irrigation with spacing of 50 cm (I4) and 60 cm (I5) And 70 cm (I6) and all of them with three repetitions. The results of mean square variance analysis showed significant difference in tape irrigation distance and wheat component on, yield and water use efficiency was significant at 1% level, and irrigation interval on number of pancakes, number of seeds in the cluster, stem height, Yield and water use efficiency were significant at 1% level and significant differences were observed on 1000 grain weight at 5% level. And the interaction effects on 1000 grain weight and grain number per cluster was not significant, but there was a significant difference between the number of pancakes and the level of 1%. Also, stem height and yield and water use efficiency at 5% level were statistically significant Had The highest yield and water use efficiency related to the irrigation bar spacing 50 and fixed irrigation type were 4958 kg / ha and 1. 57 kg / m3, respectively, and the least irrigation bar spacing were 50 with alternating irrigation it is equal to 3005 kg / ha and 95 / kg / m3 respectively. The performance and efficiency of water use in irrigation were measured at 5030 kg / ha and 1.05 kg / m3 respectively. The results of this study showed that irrigation intervals of 50, 60 and 70 cm with irrigation method were recommended for wheat cultivation in the study area. the irrigation bar spacing 50 with fixed type is more better than furrow irrigation in drought years, because of saving water around 1620 cubic meters and less than 500 kilograms decrease performance .

Keywords


افشار،ه.1391 . اثر فاصله­ی لترال و روزنه در آبیاری قطره­ای بر روی عملکرد گندم. گزارش نهایی شماره 83. موسسه تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی.
باغانی،ج و علیزاده،ا. 1379. عملکرد محصول و کارایی مصرف آب در آبیاری قطره­ای و شیاری. مجله تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی 18. 5 :1-10.
ترک­نژاد،ا.، آقایی سربزه،م.، جعفری،ح.، شیروانی،ع.ر.، روئین تن،ر.، نعمتی،ع و شهبازی،خ. 1385. ارزیابی فنی و اقتصادی روش آبیاری قطره­ای در گندم و مقایسه آن با روش آبیاری سطحی. مجله پژوهش و سازندگی در زراعت و باغبانی . 72 : 36-44.
خزاعی،م .1376. مقایسه عملکرد و کیفیت خربزه در دو روش آبیاری قطره ای و شیاری در شریط آب و هوایی مشهد . پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد ، دانشکده کشاورزی ، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
طرفی،ک.، کیهانی،ع.ر  و شهیدی،ع. 1385. تجربه استفاده از روش آبیاری قطره ای تیپ در اراضی کشاورزی اندیمشک. مجموعه مقالات. اولین همایش ملی مدرییت شبکه های آبیاری  وزهکشی. دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز.
فرشی،ع.ا و صحاف امین،ب. 1378. آبیاری قطره­ای. اصول و مبانی طراحی شبکه آبیاری قطره­ای. انتشارات نشر آموزش کشاورزی.  264 صفحه.
فرشی،ع و میرلطیفی،م.1382. مدیریت آب در مزرعه. کتاب گروه کار استفاده پایدار از منبع آب برای تولید محصولات کشاورزی شماره 76. کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی ایران. 200 صفحه.
علیزاده،ا.1376. اصول و عملیات آبیاری قطره ای. انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی، مشهد.450 صفحه.
Ahire,N.R., Bhoi,P.G and Solanke,A.V.2000. Effect  of   row  spacing  and  planting  system  on  growth  and yield  of   potato  under  surface  and  drip  irrigation.  Journal   of   the  Indian  phatato   Association. 27.1-2: 59-60.
Monotti,M., Borghi,B., Chiducci,M., Boggini,G and Gambelli,M.L. 1982. Effects of irrigation and other ogronomic practices on Wheat grain yield. Universita di Perugia General ecoltivazioni Erba Universita di Perugia.
Saleem,M.,  Wagas,A and  Ahmad,R.N.  2010.  Comparison  of  three  Wheat  varieties  With  different  irrigation  systems  For  water  productivity . International Journal  of Agriculture Apply Science. 2.1: 7-10
Sivanappan,P.K. 1988. Economic  of  drip  irrigation  for  various  crops  in  India . Forth  International  Micro  irrigation  congress. October 23 -26 .  Abury.  Wodonga , Australia
Singh,S., Vir-Komar,D.R., Agarwal,M.C., Mangal,J.L., Single,P and Komar,K. 1990.Performance of drip and surface irrigation for water melon in heavy soils.Proceeding of 11th international congress on use of plastics.Agriculture, New Delhi , India 26 February-2 nd March. Netherlands, A.A. Bakema
Srininvas,K., Hegde,D.M and Havangi,G.V. 1989. Irrigation studies on water melon. Irrigation Science.10: 293-301