نشریه آبیاری و زهکشی ایران

نشریه آبیاری و زهکشی ایران

مقیاس‌سازی مدل موج سینماتیک در آبیاری نواری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده آب و خاک، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران
2 گروه تحقیقات آبیاری و زهکشی، موسسه تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، سازمان آموزش و ترویج تحقیقات کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
چکیده
آبیاری سطحی در مرحله طراحی، ارزیابی و شبیه‌سازی به حجم بالایی از اطلاعات میدانی نیاز دارد؛ خصوصاً داده‌های مرتبط با حرکت و نفوذ آب که شرایط نسبی مزرعه را به‌خوبی بیان کنند. هدف از این تحقیق مقیاس‌سازی آبیاری نواری است. برای این منظور فرم مقیاس‌شده معادله نفوذ کوستیاکف مورداستفاده قرار گرفت و سپس مدل موج سینماتیک مقیاس‌شده است. نتایج نشان داد با تعریف مناسب عوامل مقیاس معادله موج سینماتیک به‌صورت مستقل از شرایط اولیه و مزرعه مقیاس می‌شود. در ادامه ابتدا یک معادله واحد به منحنی پیشروی آب در سیستم آبیاری نواری برازش داده شد و سپس مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. برای ارزیابی از اطلاعات ۱۸ نوار شامل ۹ نوار کشت نشده و ۹ نوار گندم کشت‌شده استفاده شد. عوامل مقیاس به نحوی تعیین شد که معادله موج سینماتیک به معادله‌ای مستقل از شرایط اولیه و نوع خاک تبدیل شود. نتایج نشان داد معادله t_(〖AX〗^*)^*=1.8628x^(*^1.1293 ) به‌عنوان معادله تجربی به‌دست‌آمده از منحنی پیشروی مقیاس‌شده برای هر یک از نوارهای آبیاری، دارای ریشه میانگین مربعات خطا (RMSE) کمتر از ۱۲ دقیقه و درصد میانگین مطلق خطای پیش‌بینی (Ea) در اکثر مواقع کمتر از ۱۱ درصد می‌باشد. همچنین ضریب تعیین (R2) میان پیشروی پیش‌بینی‌شده از طریق معادله و پیشروی مشاهداتی همواره دارای مقادیر بالای ۹۶ درصد بوده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Scaling the Kinematic Wave Model in Border Irrigation

نویسندگان English

Amir Nabizadeh Sarabandi 1
Peyman Afrasiab 1
Mohammad Mahdi Chari 1
Hossein Dehghanisanij 2
1 Water Engineering Department, Faculty of water and soil, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 Irrigation and Drainage Research Department, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

Surface irrigation requires a large amount of field information in the design, evaluation, and simulation stages, especially data related to water movement and infiltration that describe the relative conditions of the field well. The purpose of this research is to scale strip irrigation. For this purpose, the scaled form of the Kostyakov infiltration equation was used, and then the kinematic wave model was scaled. The results showed that with an appropriate definition of scale factors, the kinematic wave equation is scaled independently of the initial conditions and the field. Next, a single equation was fitted to the water advance curve in the strip irrigation system and then evaluated. For the evaluation, data from 18 strips, including 9 uncultivated strips and 9 cultivated wheat strips, were used. The scale factors were determined so that the kinematic wave equation becomes an equation independent of the initial conditions and soil type. The results showed that equation t_(〖AX〗^*)^*=1.8628x^(*^1.1293 ), as an empirical equation obtained from the scaled advance curve for each of the irrigation strips, has a root mean square error (RMSE) of less than 12 minutes, and the mean absolute percentage of the prediction error (Ea) is less than 11 percent in most cases. Also, the coefficient of determination (R2) between the predicted advance through the equation and the observed advance has always had values above 96 percent.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Similar states
Scaling
Advance curve
Kostiakov infiltration
پوزن، م. ط..، چاری، م. م.، افراسیاب، پ. و کهخامقدم، پ. ۱۳۹۸. کاربرد مقیاس‌سازی در برآورد مشخصات نفوذ خاک. مجله تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران. (۵۰) ۷: ۱۶۸۷-۱۶۷۷
جوادی، ع.، مشعل، م.، ابراهیمیان، ح. ۱۳۹۳. ارزیابی عملکرد و حساسیت معادلات نفوذ نسبت به شرایط اولیه و مرزی مختلف در آبیاری جویچه‌ای. فصلنامه پژوهش آب در کشاورزی. (۲۸) ۴: ۷۹۹-۷۸۸.
چاری، م. م. ۱۳۹۹. مقیاس‌سازی معادله بیلان حجمی در آبیاری نواری. مجله تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران. (۵۱) ۲: ۳۷۳-۳۶۳.
مغفرتی، ح. ر.، چاری، م. م.، افراسیاب، پ.، دلبری، م. ۱۳۹۹. ارائه معادله بیلان حجمی برای روش دونقطه‌ای جدید. مجله آبیاری و زهکشی ایران. (۱۴) ۳: ۱۰۶۶-۱۰۵۵
Adamala, S., Raghuwanshi, N. S. and Mishra, A. 2014. Development of Surface Irrigation Systems Design and Evaluation Software (SIDES). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 100: 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.11.004
Akbari, M., Gheysari, M., Mostafazadeh-Fard, B. and Shayannejad, M. 2018. Surface irrigation simulation-optimization model based on meta-heuristic algorithms. Agric. Water Manag. 201, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.015
Alazba, A. A. 1999. Dimensionless advance curves for infiltration families.Agric. Water Manage. 41: 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00113-9
Atchison, K. T. 1973. Retragance coefficient and other data for a vegetated irrigation border. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Arizona: Tucson, USA.
Bautista, E., Strelkoff, T. and Clemmens, A. J. 2012. Improved Surface Volume Estimates for Surface Irrigation Volume-Balance Calculations. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage .138:715-726. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000461
Chari, M. M., Davari, K., Ghahraman, B. and Ziaiei, A. N. 2019. General equation for advance and recession of water in border irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage, 68 (3): 676-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2342
Chari, M. M., Poozan, M. T. and Afrasiab, P. 2020. Modeling soil water infiltration variability using scaling. Biosystem Engineering. 196: 5 6 -66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.05.014
Chari, M. M., Poozan, M. T. and Afrasiab, P. 2021. Modeling infiltration in surface irrigation with minimum measurement (study of USDA–NRCS intake families). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 7: 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00865-z
Childs, J., Wallender, W. W., and Hopmans, J. W. 1993. Spatial and seasonal variation of furrow infiltration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage engineering. 119(1): 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:1(74)
Costabile, P., Costanzo, C., Gangi, F., Iapige De Gaetani, C., Rossi, L., Gandolfi, C. and Masseroni, D. 2023. High-resolution 2D modelling for simulating and improving the management of border irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 275: 108042: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108042
Fadul, E., Masih, I., De Fraiture, C. and Suryadi, F. X. 2020. Irrigation performance under alternative field designs in a spate irrigation system with large field dimensions. Agricultural water management. 231: 105989 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105989
Gonçalves, J. M., Miao, Q., Duarte, I. M. and Shi, H. 2021. Water-saving techniques and practices for on-farm surface irrigation systems. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 3(1): 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09675
Guzmán-Rojo, D. P., Bautista, E., Gonzalez-Trinidad, J. G. and Bronson, K. F. 2019.Variability of furrow infiltration and estimated infiltration parameters in a macroporous Soil. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering. 145(2): 04018041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001366
Irmak, S., Odhiambo, L. O., Kranz, W. L., and Eisenhauer, D. E. 2011. Irrigation efficiency and uniformity, and crop water use efficiency. 1-8
Katopodes, N. D. and Strelkoff, T. 1977. Dimensionless Solutions of Border Irrigation Advance. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE. 103 (4): 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001168
Khatri, K. L., and Smith, R. J. 2006. Real-time prediction of soil infiltration characteristics for the management of furrow irrigation. Irrigation Science. 25: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0032-1
Maghferati, H. R., Chari, M. M., and Afrasiab, P. 2021. Investigation of various volume–balance methods in surface irrigation. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 14: 241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06505-9
Mailapalli, D. R., Raghuwanshi, N. S., Singh, R., Schmitz, G. H., and Lennartz, F. 2008. Spatial and temporal variation of manning’s roughness coefficient in furrow irrigation. Jounal of Irrigation and Drainage. Eng. 134 (2): 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437 (2008)134:2(185)
Masseroni, D., Ricart, S., De Cartagena, F. R., Monserrat, J., Gonçalves, J. M., De Lima, I., Facchi, A., Sali, Gravity-fed surface irrigation systems in Mediterranean European contexts. Water Journal. 9 (1): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9010020
Miller, E. E. and Miller, R. D. 1956. Physical theory for capillary flow phenomena. Journal of Applied Physics. 27(4): 324-332. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722370
Morris, M. R., Hussaina, A., Gillies, M. H border irrigation performance. Agric. Water Manage. 155, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.017
Oyonarte, N. A., Mateos, L., and Palomo, M. J. 2002. Infiltration variability in furrow irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 128(1): 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:1(26)
Pazouki, E. 2021. A practical surface irrigation design based on fuzzy logic and meta-heuristic algorithms. Agricultural Water Management. 256: 107069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107069
Pereira, L. S., Oweis, T., and Zairi, A. 2002. Irrigation management under water scarcity. Agricultural water management 57 (3): 175–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02) 00075-6
Ram, R. S. 1969. Hydraulics of recession flow in border irrigation system. M.S. thesis. Indian Inst. of Technol. Kharagpur, India.
Ram, R. S. 1972. Comparison of infiltration measurement techniques. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 9(2): 67-75.
Ram, R. S., and Lal, R. 1971. Recession flow in border irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 8(3): 62-70.
Roth, R. L. 1974. Data for border irrigation models. Trans.ASAE. 17 (1): 157-161.
Schwankl L. J., Raghuwanshi, N.S performance under spatially varying conditions. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering. 126: 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:6(355)
Singh, V. P. and Ram, R. S. 1983. A kinemutic model for surface irrigation: verljicution by experimental data. Water Resources Research. 19 (6) 1599-1612. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i006p01599
Smith, R. J., Uddin, M. J. and Gillies, M. H. 2018. Estimating irrigation duration for high performance furrow irrigation on cracking clay soils. Agricultural Water Management. 206: 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.014
Soroush, F., Fenton, J. D., Mostafazadeh-Fard, B., Mousavi, S. F. and Abbasi, F. 2013. Simulation of furrow irrigation using the slow-change/slow-flow equation. Agricultural Water Management. 116L 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.07.008
Strelkoff, T. and Clemmens. A. J. 1994. Dimensional analysis in surface irrigation. Irrigation Science. 15 (2-3): 57-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187194
Strelkoff, T. and Katopodes, N. D. 1977. Border Irrigation Hydraulics with Zero Inertia. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering. 103(3): 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001157
Vico, G. and Porporato, A. 2011. From Rainfed Agriculture to Stress-Avoidance Irrigation: I. A Generalized Irrigation Scheme with Stochastic Soil Moisture. Advances in Water Resources. 34 (2): 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.11.010
Xu, J., Cai, H., Saddique, Q., Wang, X., Li, L., Ma, C., and Lu, Y. 2019. Evaluation and optimization of border irrigation in different irrigation seasons based on temporal variation of infiltration and roughness. Agricultural Water Management. 214: 64–77. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.003
Yitayew, M. and Fangemeier, D. D. 1984. Dimensionless runoff curves for irrigation borders. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 110: 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1984)110:2(179)